On the other hand, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Confabulation) told Tim Russert last Sunday that Lam 1) was a Clinton fundraiser 2) was just a law professor and (3) had little or no prosecutorial experience.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdc71/bdc71d7dafcf4b672685d9ff0ebf814814584184" alt=""
So why would Hatch subject himself to such exposure. Here are some explanations.
First, he thought the media would be too distracted by Britney's shiny, lumpy cranium to notice.
Second, he was just repeating the talking points that his chief of staff heard at the last GOP We-Don't-Have-A-Prayer breakfast with Karl Rove.
Three, he's advocating for Gonzales, which means he has no business sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee. And he's a liar.
h/t Josh
Update: Josh sheds more light on Hatch's prevarications. The Senator has issued an explanation for his MTP moment: Everything he said was true, except that he wasn't really talking about Carol Lam. He meant to say Alan Bersin, the previous San Diego USA under Clinton.
Bersin was a law professor with little prosecutorial experience who was appointed in 1993 because he was friends with Clinton at Yale and raised money for the Clinton campaign. So take out "Bersin" and insert "Lam" and voila, a senior-sleaze moment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a429/0a429e6d50c6ebf3785ac6f70861e9422ee38b6c" alt=""
Update: The above paragraph is factually accurate, except that I accidentally used Hatch's name instead of Jeffrey Dahmer's. But I still stand behind everything I wrote.
2 comments:
You're terribly unfair to Mr. Dahmer
yes, but painfully accurate about the senator, and many others like him!
Post a Comment